Regional Workshop on Emergency Telecommunications
for the Central American and Caribbean Region
Trinidad and Tobago,
November 4th - 9th, 1996
Introduction
The participants recognized the importance of increased cooperation among the states and territories in the region as well as between the emergency management and telecommunications sectors in the prevention and mitigation of disasters.
Participants agreed that it is imperative that the broad framework of disaster management (including prevention, preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery) be the basis from which discussion should proceed and that all sectors of emergency management must be encouraged to engage in the discussions since each uses telecommunications technologies and service in the conduct of their respective roles and responsibilities.
The participants noted that the breadth of technologies involved in disaster telecommunications included telecommunications service providers and equipment manufacturers as well as government and private sector representatives of applied sectors of broadcasting, remote sensing, Internet, Amateur Radio, etc.
Consensus Agreements and Observations
1. Workshop participants recognized that a number of agencies are undertaking activities to develop regional emergency telecommunications capabilities and services. It was agreed that mechanisms to ensure enhanced regional cooperation along with improved national level cooperation were necessary. The workshop discussed approaches to achieve this, focusing on initiatives already being taken by such agencies as CDERA, CTU and others.
2. Workshop participants expressed their support for the Convention on the Provision of Telecommunications Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations, and encourage their respective governments to adopt the Convention when it will be formally presented at an Intergovernmental Conference in 1997.
3. A report on the First World Telecommunications Policy Forum (Geneva, 21-23 October 1996), dealing with the Global Mobile Personal Communications by Satellite was presented for discussion. Workshop participants agreed to provide ITU with comments on the Draft MOU by the end of December 1996.
4. It was noted that while Resolution 640 covers short term frequency allocation for emergencies, the workshop participants agreed that every effort should be made to pursue a long term solution to the issue of frequency availability for emergency telecommunications, and specific appropriate steps should be taken to solicit the allocation to emergency telecommunications service of specific frequency bands by a future competent ITU World Radio Conference.
5. Workshop participants noted the importance of telecommunications technology for emergencies used by the national and international telecommunications services and equipment providers. Further, emphasis was given to the following:
a) guaranteeing the survivability of telecommunications systems;
b) reexamining the cost and tariff structure to ensure the lowest possible price for emergency telecommunications services;
c) ensuring the increased participation of telecommunications service and equipment providers in all aspects of disaster preparation and response planning, including training and education; and
d) examining overall regimes for charges applied for the movement of equipment and materials with the goal of facilitating the provision on emergency telecommunications in disaster management.
6. Workshop participants supported new and continued cooperative initiatives towards enhancement of policies and programs for emergency communications. For example:
a) It was also noted that CDERA has initiated a number of high level activities to promote Internet in disaster management efforts within the region and is inaugurating a World Wide Web service in the near future. It was further noted that the Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Relief Coordination Program of the Pan American Health Organization is planning to expand its health sector Internet initiative into the Caribbean region as the third phase of its program which now includes Central and South America. Workshop participants indicated support for CDERA as a liaison to this PAHO initiative, and look forward enthusiastically to a regional workshop on "Use of the Internet in Disasters in the Caribbean" that is being planned by PAHO and DHA in the 1997 time frame.
b) The CTU intergovernmental effort to promote regional and multilateral support for technical assistance programs in the sector.
The discussions on themes of the agenda are summarized as follows:
Working Group A1
Telecommunications Requirements of Disaster Mitigation and Response Mechanisms
Frequency allocation, maintenance of equipment, training, standardization and the use of modern technology were among subject areas considered. The group focused on problems encountered in the region and identified the following issues as needing further attention:
1. Regional cooperation in emergency communications should be strengthened by collaborative efforts between CDERA, CTU, and other appropriate regional agencies and national emergency telecommunications coordinators of member states.
2. That adequate attention should be given to appropriate ways in which the new GMDSS system can be linked to national telecommunications networks.
3. ITU Radio Regulations urge administrators to take into account the possible needs for communications by radio when national communications are interrupted or not available. Resolution 640 opens certain frequency bands allocated to the Radio Amateur Service under certain conditions for international disaster communications. However, there is need for a short term measures aimed at addressing the problem with frequency allocation while more long term measures are being discussed. Short term measures could include the identification of coordinated frequencies (outside the Amateur Bands) at the regional level. In the long term the frequency problem might be resolved by allocating frequency bands for the emergency telecommunications service so that this will have to be included in the agenda of a future competent ITU World Radio Conference.
4. Consideration should be given to ensure that EOC radio rooms within the region be equipped with a secondary source of power to enable them to function in the absence of the regular power supply.
5. There is an unmet need in the region for adequate training of emergency telecommunications personnel in the use and maintenance of equipment. Creation of certifiable training programs might be a way to address this problem
6. Modern technology should be used to the advantage of emergency telecommunications within the region. This would ensure that broad-based applications would not be limited to HF and VHF radio, but would include all appropriate technologies and modes of communications
7. A real need was expressed that message forms and other documentation used in emergency telecommunications should be standardized throughout the region.
8. There was also a suggestion that there would be value in developing an evaluation guide for use in the region
9. An inventory of telecommunications resources in the region should be compiled
Working Group B1
The Vulnerability of Telecommunications Networks
1. Governments, Administrations, and Operators might benefit from:
a. Preparation of national assessments of risk, including identification of those natural hazards which pose disaster threats to telecommunications systems
b. Preparation of national and/or local prevention and preparedness plans, including adoption of telecommunications infrastructure construction and maintenance practices to resist or avoid hazards
c. Sensitize these vulnerability assessments and preparedness and prevention plans among telecommunications operators within the region
2. Administrations and Operators may seek to secure copies of prevention and preparedness plans from areas of similar vulnerability around the world
3. Administrations and operators should maintain backup systems in the face of new technology penetration
4. Administrations should develop a regular and standardized process for revising and updating procedure for mitigation and restoration and make these revisions and updates known to all concerned on a timely basis
5. Where possible, simulation exercises should be conducted regularly and with the evolvement of all relevant entities
6. Administrations are encouraged to conduct research designed to access the impact of new industrial development on telecommunications vulnerability
7. Administrations are encouraged to maintain constant public awareness as to potential for telecommunications interruptions in disasters
9. Administrations are encouraged to maintain suitable building codes for EOCs and telecommunications facilities in the region
10. Administration are encouraged to foster continued cooperation between neighboring islands for recovery (e.g., in the event of major aircraft accidents).
11. National entities might consider augmenting their telecommunications systems by emulating amateur systems design.
The recommendation was made that CANTO be asked to investigate and collect information regarding the vulnerability of telecommunications networks and distribute the results to the telecommunications operators in the form of a "lessons learned" report.
C1
Structuring the Role of the Amateur Radio Service in Disaster Management
The historic role of Amateur Radio operators in disaster management was discussed and affirmed. It was also noted that significant involvement of Amateur Radio operations will continue into the foreseeable future and there is a need, therefore, to reconcile this role in the context of broader disaster preparedness and response coordination mechanisms. The working group identified and elaborated on issues that must be considered in order to optimize the integration of the role of radio amateurs into existing and future national, regional, and international formal emergency management systems. Among the issues discussed, it was the working group's considered opinion that:
1. Amateur radio operators should be seen as providing resources that are complementary to national and regional emergency telecommunications assets. Each nation has a responsibility to provide for adequate telecommunications infrastructure that has been designed with the particular vulnerabilities of the nation in mind. Amateur Radio resources should not be considered as replacement for emergency telecommunications infrastructure. They should be considered complementary.
2. It was noted that Amateur Radio operators providing Amateur Radio services should function as communicators, and not be seen as replacements for other emergency functions or as assuming the role of emergency managers
3. Amateur Radio operators functioning as communicators of vital information prepared by statutory disaster management authorities should be common, standardized terminology, such as advocated by CDERA. Governments should not use radio amateurs for routine communications, nor should Amateur Radio operators be requested to interpret messages in emergency situations. This being said, it was also recognized that a valuable role is played by amateur radio operators in communicating health and welfare information, especially on behalf of individuals and families who may otherwise have no means to ascertain the status of their loved ones and property.
4. In an effort to facilitate and support a collaborative relationship in emergency situations, the value of Memoranda of Understanding between radio amateur groups and emergency management agencies was discussed. It was the opinion of the working group that involvement in these discussions should be at local/parish, national, subregional, and regional levels and that roles and responsibilities of each entity should be defined as a preparedness measure. It was further discussed that consideration should be given to improving notification to employers for releasing employees for disaster service. Emphasis was placed on the need to develop a plan to provide for replacement of personal equipment damaged while in service during official communications activities.
5. It was also noted that there is a need to further discuss the issue of encouraging governments to coordinate purchase of radio equipment with the amateur radio community for field application as well for use at EOCs to ensure that amateur equipment is complimentary with equipment of the government.
6. Finally, international licensing was discussed as an important factor in facilitating the movement of amateur radio operators across national borders.
The working group proposed a number of policy issues for possible action:
1. There is a need for technical assistance from government and/or NGOs to amateur radio groups in regard to specialized disaster training, specialized equipment, and facilities within emergency management compounds
2. There is a need for formal recognition of the role of Amateur Radio in emergency management and the development of memoranda of understanding at national levels
3. There is a need to support development of detailed comprehensive operational emergency planning between emergency management and Amateur Radio groups in a collaborative manner
4. There is a need to eliminate barriers to the importation of amateur equipment and supplies
5. All nations should sign and ratify the International Amateur Radio Permit
6. There should be a conference of Regional Amateur Radio Groups and Emergency Management Officials and decision-makers to discuss common problems, such as standardizing equipment and defining protocols.
7. It is recommended that radio amateurs in the region support and provide meteorological information to established international and regional amateur weather networks including the Hurricane Watch (14.325 MHz) which serves as an important data source for the National Hurricane Center (US). And further, that each island-nation should have at least one "Automatic Packet Weather Reporting Station" linked to the Hurricane Center via amateur collaboration.
A2
Transborder use of Telecommunications Equipment, Licensing Requirements
Introduction
The session consisted of two short presentations given by delegates of the Bahamas and St. Kitts-Nevis, followed by a discussion on existing problems related to the issuing of licenses and the role of the department of Customs and Excise. Finally, the group tabled a number of recommendations which can resolve the above problems.
Bahamas
The delegate of the Bahamas outlined the structure and objectives of the National Emergency Operations Center (NEOC). He also listed main telecommunications tools used by his organization. The NEOC as a body coordinates activities related to disaster mitigation, relief, and recovery. It makes use of cellular telephony, VHF radio, portable satellite terminals, the radio system of the Red Cross and the state broadcasting facilities.
St. Kitts-Nevis
The St. Kitts-Nevis delegate summarized the main features of the country's national Emergency Management Agency (NEMA). The organization has at its disposal the following telecommunications facilities during emergencies.
-- four commercial radio stations (two each in St. Kitts and Nevis)
-- two TV stations (one government-owned, one private)
-- cable TV network which transmits weather information on a channel during a hurricane
Other equipment used include radio transmitter (frequency 7-850 MHZ) and satellite voice channels. NEMA receives assistance from amateur radio operators. The delegate reported that the Internet service (called "Caribnet") has proved itself too slow even for non-critical activities
Problems
The problems related to the theme of this session include:
1. The issuing of licenses, and
2. The "red tape" which emanates from the Department of Customs and Excise (of the various Caribbean territories) with respect to the transfer of equipment from one country to another
However, in St. Kitts-Nevis, NEMA advances the paperwork prior to the arrival of the equipment, thus simplifying the admission process. Barbados, too, conducts similar facilitation exercises on a bilateral basis when it becomes necessary to transfer equipment used in the Eastern Caribbean Fiber System (ECFS). However, the transfer of ECFS equipment to the French territories requires a lead time of some three weeks to process the paperwork. The entry of telecommunications equipment into Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago requires placement of bonds until the articles leave the two countries. In the case of Trinidad and Tobago, obtaining a license does not present any difficulty.
Recommendations
1. To increase the efficiency in net-controlling in preparation for a response, each country should, according to schedule, agree on common regional emergency network frequency bands.
2. That Amateur Radio Groups should have a representative in the regional emergency network to enhance Amateur Radio organization in each country.
3. Design a mechanism to facilitate transborder communications with non-English-speaking countries, especially the dependent Dutch and French territories
4. National Emergency organizations should include a representative from the Department of Customs and Excise and should consider waiving the bond normally placed on telecommunications equipment during an emergency requiring transborder activities.
5. Each country should negotiate and sign a multilateral agreement with other countries with a view to the elimination of duties when moving (for emergency use) telecommunications equipment from one country to another for pre- and post disaster activities
Note:
Out of the need to respect the sovereignty of nations, users of the Iridium and Odessy LEO/MED satellite systems should not operate from those counties which have not obtained a license to access the system. However, an INMARSAT terminal, once registered, can act as a gateway from any country provided that the host country issues the relevant license.
B2
Cost Effectiveness and Tariff Structures for Emergency Telecommunications
Mitigation and warning
1. It was noted that adequate structures/systems/networks which exist should be made use of as far as possible because they are tried and tested. These include local networks, amateur networks, others.
To ensure cost effectiveness:
2. It was noted that special tariffs for some services, already in place should be expanded to other nations. These include systems for Meteorological and Seismic Monitoring
3. The working group also discussed the need for special tariffs covering emergency simulations, testing, etc.
Incident
1. To ensure cost effectiveness protection/security of local telecommunications facilities needed
2. Education of public to minimize expensive restoration (e.g., system crash due to overloads, vandalism of cables, etc.)
-- Need for tariff removal agreement for amateur radio operators (e.g., link to local and international networks, and carrying third party traffic through external administrations)
Response
1. Each country should assess the need for large complex systems which would be expensive
-- Identify what is adequate for the incident
-- Identify what is appropriate (e.g., voice/data)
2. Administrations to assess the robustness of existing networks (e.g., redundancy, construction robustness, ability for self healing, etc.)
Recommendations
1. Telecommunications administrations provide a facility similar to 800 numbers for purpose of disaster preparedness and recovery
2. Negotiations should be carried out by responsible organization (e.g., CANTO) for securing tariff free communications for testing and simulations and other considerations
3. All major telecommunications administrations should be notified by regional body (e.g., CDERA) of disaster area
B3
Recommendations for Compatibility and Standardization
The main issues discussed were: power, frequency, standards
The following recommendations were made:
1. All radio equipment used for emergency telecommunications be able to operate on DC. 12 volts was suggested
2. The establishment of an emergency telecommunications committee that was proposed in 1989 to focus on network design, standards and compatibility of equipment and to implement and commission a regional system for emerging telecommunications
3. Common frequencies for emergencies on a national and regional level
that the short term solutions being used be replaced by long term solutions
4. That the short term solutions being used to be replaced by long-term solutions
5. That a resource catalogue be produced which will enable countries of the region to source spare parts to restore their system after a disaster
C3
The Role of Internet in Regional Emergency Telecommunications in the Region
The working group noted the importance of the Internet as an additional system for strategic decision-making and operational coordination of emergencies as well as a means to gather and exchange information to support planning and prevention efforts. In particular the working group considered the value of the Internet in preparing for disasters by providing easy, low cost access to data from widespread sources, allowing efficient distribution of important information to diverse audiences, and facilitating the improved organization, coordination, and policy making concerning disaster mitigation. Given the many proven practical benefits of the Internet the Working Group recommends:
1. That national, multinational, NGO, and private disaster mitigation and response organizations continue to provide and expand their use of the Internet to access relevant information; and to provide which information to each other, professional organizations, the media, and the public; to coordinate their mitigation activities; and to further collective action on other recommendations resulting from this workshop. In this respect, the Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Relief Coordination Program of the Pan American Health Organization is planning to expand its health sector Internet initiative into the Caribbean region as the third phase of its program which now includes Central and South America. The Working Group endorsed this idea and recommended that the initial Caribbean liaison for initiative be St. Lucia which has agreed and has offered to host a workshop, in cooperation with PAHO and DHA, on "Use of the Internet in Disasters in the Caribbean" in the 1997 time frame.
2. That national, multinational, NGO, and private disaster mitigation and response organizations cooperate with each other to establish and maintain a directory of relevant information available via the Internet (i.e., WWW sites, e-mail addresses of disaster managers and telecommunications service providers, etc.).
A caution was given that individuals and organizations intending to use Internet information during or in the immediate aftermath of a disaster event must ensure that the communications links they rely on to access Internet are not themselves susceptible to damage during a disaster, or ensure that reliable redundant links are available.
Annex 1
Agenda and Schedule for the
Regional Workshop on Emergency Telecommunications for the Central American and Caribbean Region
Monday, 4 November 1996
13.00 - 18.00 Arrival of Participants, Registration
18.00 - 20.00 Get-together
(industry-sponsored reception or buffet dinner)
Tuesday, 5 November 1996
09.00 - 10.00 Opening session
10.30 - 12.00 First Plenary session: The disaster scenarios and the response mechanisms in the Region
(Chair: CDERA; presentation of a case study by a participant)
13.30 - 15.00 Second Plenary session: The Telecommunications infrastructure and its emergency preparedness for the Region
(Chair: CTU; presentation of case studies by participants)
15.15 - 16.30 Parallel Working Group sessions:
A1: Telecommunication Requirements of disaster mitigation and response mechanisms
B1: The Vulnerability of Telecommunication Networks - by natural disasters, - by "man-made disasters", - by other events (CME etc.)
Wednesday, 6 November 1996
08.30 - 10.00 Presentations of services
(Announced so far: - The Iridium Satellite System, - The Amateur Radio Service - The Odyssey Satellite System
10.30 - 12.30 Third Plenary session: Presentation of Results of Working Group sessions A1 and B1; proposals for recommendations for improvements
13.30 - 16.30 Visit(s) to installations / institutions (organized by CTU)
Thursday, 7 November 1996
08.30 - 10.00 Fourth Plenary session: Regulatory and Policy Issues
(Chair: ITU)
10.30 - 12.30 Parallel Working Groups
A2: The trans-border use of telecommunications equipment; licensing requirements,
B2: Cost Effectiveness and Tariff Structures for Emergency Telecommunications,
13.30 - 15.00 Parallel Working Groups:
A3: Proposals for Improved Regional Cooperation Mechanisms
B3: Recommendations for Compatibility and Standardization
Friday, 8 November 1996
08.30 - 10.00 Presentations of equipment and services
10.30 - 12.30 Sixth Plenary session: Adoption of the Recommendations prepared by Working Groups A3 and B3
13.30 - 15.00 (To be allocated)
15.30 - 16.30 Closing session
17.30 Fair-well-event
Saturday, 9 November
Departure of participants
Possible post-conference excursions or specialized post-conference meetings
------------------------------------------------
Annex 2
List of Participants
Regional Workshop on Emergency Telecommunication
November 5 - 8, 1996
Note: We apologize for any errors and omissions. Thank you for your understanding.
NAME |
TITLE |
ORGANIZATION |
| Acosta, Edgardo (Dr.) |
Coordinator SUMA Project |
Pan American Health Organization (USA) |
| Alfred, Theo | Member | Emergency Telecommunications Committee Trinidad and Tobago |
| Been, Kingsley | National Disaster Co-ordinator | National Disaster Co-ordinator Turks & Caicos |
| Berridge, Cyril | Coordinating Director Regional Met. Services |
Caribbean Meteorological Organization Trinidad and Tobago |
| Brade, Juliette | National Disaster Co-ordinator | Disaster Preparedness Office Montserrat |
| Brown, Arnel | Manager Commercial Affairs |
TEL-EM- N.V. St. Maarten |
| Burwell, B. Banks | Refugee Relief Worker | COMSAT Mobile Telecommunications |
| Calliste, Neville A.C. | Policy Consultant | Grenatel, Grenada |
| Carnegie, Ralph (Prof.) | Executive Director | Caribbean Law Institute Centre |
| Cate, Fred (Prof.) | Professor, Drafter of the Convention on Disaster Comm. |
Indiana University, School of Law |
| Céant, Jean Arry | Directeur Général | Conseil National des Télécommunications, Haiti |
| Cheston, Aric | Manager, Emergency Telecommunications Response Programme | Iridium Inc. USA |
| Clarke, Eric | Planning Engineer | Barbados External Telecommunications Ltd. |
| Coffman, James (Sgt.) |
Emergency Manager | Emergency Operations Bureau Los Angeles, County Sheriff Department |
| Collymore, Jeremy | Regional Co-ordinator | Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency (CDERA) |
| Crichlow Sylvan | Amateur Radio Operator | Amateur Radio Society Trinidad & Tobago |
| Cupid, Alwyn | National Disaster Co-ordinator | St.Vincent and the Grenadines |
| Defour, Shelton (Major) | Major | Belize Defense Force, Belize |
| Donawa, Noel | Director | International Amateur Radio Union, Region 2, Area E, Trinidad & Tobago |
| Dowe, Christian | Telecommunications Officer | Ministry of Communications, Works and Public
Utilities, St.Kitts and Nevis |
| Edwards, Arthur | Member | Emergency Telecommunications Committee Trinidad and Tobago |
| Estrada, Eduardo | Emergency Co-ordinator | International Amateur Radio Union, Region 2, Ecuador |
| Farrell, Goli (Mrs.) |
Consultant | United Nations (DHA), Switzerland |
| Farrell, Vincent Francis | Amateur Radio Operator | Trinidad and Tobago Amateur Radio Society |
| Ferdinand David | Manager Transmission Systems |
Cable and Wireless Castries St. Lucia |
| Finlay Robert Oliver | Disaster Preparedness Co-ordinator | Grenada Telecommunications Ltd. P.O. Box 119 St. George?s Grenada |
| Finley, Oliver | Grenada | |
| Garro, Victor | Consultant | Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and
World Health Organization (WHO), (USA) |
| Gattis, Stephen T. (Lt.) |
Emergency Manager | Los Angeles, County Sheriff Department |
| Gelman-Muravchik, Ovsei (Prof.) |
Research Professor, Advisor |
National Civil Protection System, Mexico |
| Gittens, Elinor | Researcher | Science Technology, Tertiatiary Education and
Telecommunications Unit, Office of the Prime Minister |
| Griffith John | Co-ordinator | Institute of Marine Affairs Trinidad and Tobago |
| Griffith, Livingstone | Telecommunications Services of Trinidad and
Tobago Trinidad |
|
| Grout, Derek | Director, Administration |
Odyssey-Teleglobe Canada |
| Gudge, Gulbert (Major) | Co-ordinator | National Frequency Management Unit, Guayana |
| Gunness, Balchan | Technical Assistant | Telecommunications Division, Office of the
Prime Minister Trinidad and Tobago |
| Guptar Krishna | Manager - Network Efficiency Restoration | Telecommunications Services of Trinidad and
Tobago Trinidad |
| Harbi, Mohamed | Special Advisor to the Secretary-General | International Telecommunication Union, Switzerland |
| Hart, Ian | Member | Emergency Telecommunications Committee Trinidad and Tobago |
| Herbert, Carl | Administrative Officer | N.E.M.A. St.Kitts and Nevis |
| Hernandez, Maurice | Amateur Radio Operator | Amateur Radio Society Trinidad and Tobago |
| Herring, Tim | General Manager, Land Mobile Division |
Inmarsat United Kingdom |
| Hewitt, Brian | Consultant | B.D. Hewitt & Co. Trinidad |
| Jagdip Deonanan | Safety Officer | PLIPDECO Trinidad |
| Jageosingh, Kenny | Member | Emergency Telecommunications Committee (REACT) Trinidad and Tobago |
| James, Timothy | National Disaster Co-ordinator | Office of Disaster Preparedness St. Lucia |
| Johnson, Nicole Marie Miss |
Co-ordinator | National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) Trinidad |
| Joseph Peter | Amateur Radio Operator | Trinidad and Tobago Amateur Radio Society Trinidad |
| Joseph, Zephaniah | Telecommunications Officer | Ministry of Communications and Works, Montserrat |
| Kemp, Charles | Engineer | Bahamas Telecommunications Corporation (BATELCO) Bahamas |
| Kesmodel, Robert | Director International | TESSCO Technologies Inc. |
| Khaloo Balchan | Telecommunications Member | R.E.A.C.T. Trinidad |
| Kiron, Michael | Telecommunications Officer | Cayman Islands Government |
| Konrad, Kerry M. | Senior Sales Executive | Land Mobile Sales, Comsat Mobile Communications, USA |
| Kostris, George | Director, Caribbean Operations | Motorola USA |
| Lau, Robert | Inspector of Telecom | Government of Curacao Bureau Telecom |
| Lettsome, Donald | Assistant Secretary Ministry of Communications & Works |
BVI Government British Virgin Islands |
| Lewis, Carl | Secretary-General | CANTO Trinidad and Tobago |
| Louis, Stephen | Information Systems Manager |
CDERA |
| Magee, John | Sales Manager | Motorolla USA |
| Maikoo Andre | Radio Operator | R.E.A.C.T. |
| Malone, Guy Lester | Telecommunications Officer | Ministry of Communication & Works British Virtin Islands |
| Mason, Perry | Telecommunications Officer | Ministry of Communications and Works, St.Lucia |
| Mathur, Mahendra (Col.) |
Chief Co-ordinator | NEMA Trinidad and Tobago |
| Matthew Campbell | Telecommunications Consultant | Ministry of Public Works and Communications, Antigua and Barbuda |
| Niffkeer Irvine | Assistant Co-ordinator | National Emergency Telecommunications Committee |
| Noguera, Felipe | Chief Executive Officer | CAIC Trinidad and Tobago |
| Palm, Rick | Field Services Manager | ARRL |
| Ragbir, Winston | Director Telecommunications and Chairman E.T.C. | Office of the Prime Minister, Trinidad and Tobago |
| Ramnarine, Deoraj | Consultant | Iridium LLC |
| Reese, Richard (Major) |
Director-General | Office of Disaster Preparedness and Emergency
Management (ODPEM) Jamaica |
| Robinson, Lincoln | Technical Manager | CANTO |
| Rolle, Davy Captain (N) |
Co-Chairman Emergency Communications Committee |
Royal Bahamas Defence Force, Bahamas |
| Rollocks, Rawle | Rapporteur | MAS - COMM. Ltd. Trinidad |
| Rombley Dennis | General Manager | Antelecom St. Maarten |
| Rombley Dennis | General manager | Antelecom St. Maarten |
| Romero Javier | General Manager/ Technical Assistant |
Hondutel Honduras |
| Rudder, Arnim | Amateur Radio Operator | Trinidad and Tobago Amateur Radio Society Trinidad |
| Sampson Madonna | Rapporteur | Mass-Comm. Ltd., Trinidad |
| Sanatan, Roderick | Secretary-General | Caribbean Telecommunications Union Trinidad and Tobago |
| Scatliffe, Shane | Telecommunications Officer | Ministry of Communications and Works, St.Vincent and the Grenadines |
| Scott, Jeremiah | The Honorable Minister of Communications and
Works, and President, CTU General Conference |
The Honourable Minister of Communications and
Works, and President of the CTU |
| Scott, John | President | Centre for Public Service Communications |
| Shillingford, Cecil P. | Assistant National Disaster Co-ordinator | Office of Disaster Preparedness Dominica |
| Sue-Hong Denis | Manager Transmission Systems |
Telecommunication Services of Trinidad and
Tobago Trinidad |
| Thom, Judith | Technical Specialist | Caribbean Telecommunications Union Trinidad |
| Thomas-Calliste, Joyce | National Disaster Co-ordinator | National Emergency Relief Organization Grenada |
| Thompson, Emmette | Police Constable | Representing the National Disaster Co-ordinator, Anguilla |
| Ureña, Laura (Ms.) |
Enc. Departamento Informatica | Direccion General de Telecommunicaciones, Dominican Republic |
| Vital, Sylvester | Engineer | Ministry of Communications, Works and Housing Dominica |
| Ware, Graham | Manager, International Sales | Barrett Europe Ltd. UK / Australia |
| Wenger Dennis | Professor | Texas A & M University USA |
| White, Keith | Assistant Manager, Transmission systems |
Barbados External Telecommunications Ltd. |
| Wood, Mark | Secretariat | UNDHA |
| Zimmermann, Hans | Senior Humanitarian Affairs Officer | United Nations (DHA), Switzerland |