A strengthening of the international consensus on principles can
help to prevent humanitarian assistance from being misunderstood
as an interference with the internal affairs of the receiving
State and to promote the implementation of the humanitarian obligations
of the receiving States in cooperation with the assisting States
and organizations on the basis of equality.
The recognition and implementation of the principles set out below
must not prejudice the applicability of any agreements to which
an Assisting State or organization or a Receiving State is party.
A Receiving State and an Assisting State or organization may
agree on specific terms for the conduct of humanitarian assistance
operations. A legally binding recognition and adequate implementation
of the following principles would enhance the effectiveness of
many humanitarian assistance operations.
3.1.2 Responsibility of the Receiving State. Primary responsibility for providing humanitarian assistance within the limits of the resources available rests with the national authorities of the State where persons are in need.
3.1.3 Responsibility of the assisting States and organizations. All States, organizations and persons capable of doing so should contribute to humanitarian assistance operations within the limits of the resources available to them and in accordance with the human needs to be met and the requirements set by the Receiving State.
3.1.4 Purpose. The conduct of humanitarian assistance
operations on the territory of any State shall have the purpose
of seeking to alleviate human suffering and to preserve human
life among those in urgent need. Humanitarian assistance is intended
for the immediate benefit of specified groups of persons in urgent
need. It shall be provided, received and employed exclusively
for this purpose.
3.1.5 Conditions. Humanitarian assistance shall only
be provided in accordance with the principle and rules of international
law and, in particular, the following conditions:
3.1.5.1 Respect for the sovereignty, political independence
and territorial integrity of the receiving State;
3.1.5.2 Cooperation with the authorities of the Receiving
State and respect for and observance of its laws during humanitarian
assistance operations conducted on its territory;
3.1.5.3 Abstention from any activity inconsistent with
the purpose of humanitarian assistance.
3.1.6 Noninterference. Humanitarian assistance should
be treated as a nonpolitical matter and consequently the offer
of such assistance ought not to be regarded as an interference
in the internal affairs of the Receiving State.
3.1.7 Assistance by Armed Forces. The deployment of armed
forces is particularly helpful and successful in such cases where
they could use unique resources which are not readily available
in civilian relief organizations.
International disaster relief assistance by armed forces should
be conducted under the following principles:
3.1.7.1 Disaster relief by the armed forces and national
civil defence organizations is provided in addition to the work
of non-governmental relief organizations (NGOs).
3.1.7.2 Armed forces need not be deployed as long as civil
defence organizations and NGOs master the disaster with their
personal and material capabilities.
3.1.7.3 International disaster relief assistance is supplementary
to the relief assets of the Receiving State. Support operations
by the armed forces require the consent of the Receiving State.
3.1.7.4 International disaster relief assistance is performed
in accordance with the human needs to be met and the requirements
set by the Receiving State.
3.1.7.5 The Receiving State is responsible for the safety
of the relief personnel and relief material of the Assisting State.
In principle, military personnel of the Assisting State should
be unarmed. But weapons for self-defence may be carried subject
to agreement between the Assisting State and the Receiving State.
3.1.7.6 International disaster relief assistance is based
on the principle of sovereignty of the Receiving State and the
neutrality and impartiality of the Assisting State.
3.1.7.7 In principle international disaster relief assistance
should be provided at no cost to the Receiving State. The national
defence budgets of the Assisting State can, however, not exclusively
be burdened with these costs.
3.3.2 Mediation. An impartial international organization acceptable to both the Assisting State or organization and the Receiving State may, upon their joint request, agree to serve as an intermediary with respect to any needs or matters arising in connection with humanitarian assistance operations.
3.3.3 Distinctive sign. An internationally recognized distinctive sign may be used for indicative purposes to identify humanitarian assistance consignments, services and personnel. The applicable rules governing the use of the United Nations flag and emblem and of the Red Cross and Red Crescent emblems shall be respected.
3.3.4 Facilitation of transport in third States. The
transit of humanitarian assistance consignments or personnel
of an Assisting State or organization to or from a Receiving State
across or over the territory of any other State should be expedited
as a matter of urgent priority. In particular, permission for
overflight and staging should be granted without delay and any
landing fees or related charges should be waived.
3.3.5 Responsibilities of the Assisting State or organization.
The Assisting State or organization shall ensure that the
humanitarian assistance provided is suitable for meeting assessed
needs in every respect. The Assisting State or organization shall
pack, classify and mark humanitarian assistance consignments in
accordance with appropriate standards and an established system,
ensure the use of simplified commercial documentation for humanitarian
assistance consignments based on an internationally recognized
model and comply with quality standards and other relevant regulations
applicable to humanitarian assistance consignments. Moreover,
the Assisting State or organization shall notify the Receiving
State of the appropriate details including names, positions and
functions of the personnel designated for service in humanitarian
assistance operations.
3.3.6 Rights and responsibilities of the Receiving State.
The Receiving State may decide whether or not to request or
give its consent to humanitarian assistance activities on its
territory and may determine in consultation with the Assisting
State or organization the moment of commencement and of termination
of such assistance. Having requested or consented to receive
humanitarian assistance, the Receiving State shall have responsibility,
within its territory, for coordinating humanitarian assistance
operations and, in particular, for:
3.3.6.1 designating a competent national authority
to coordinate humanitarian assistance operations;
3.3.6.2 delegating any special tasks which are necessary
in coordinating humanitarian assistance operations to the most
appropriate organizations or persons;
3.3.6.3 providing to the designated personnel of the Assisting
State or organization all information concerning any facts, developments
or action taken that may be relevant to the effective implementation
of humanitarian assistance operations;
3.3.6.4 expediting with urgent priority the delivery of
humanitarian assistance consignments to those in need;
3.3.6.5 facilitating in every way possible the humanitarian
activities of the Assisting State or organization and of their
designated personnel;
3.3.6.6 protecting in every way possible the humanitarian
activities of the assisting State or organization and their designated
personnel;
3.3.6.7 waiving the usual commercial documentation requirements
or applying simplified procedures based on an internationally
recognized model for the importation of humanitarian assistance
consignments;
3.3.6.8 waiving any prohibitions, restrictions or regulations
which would otherwise delay the importation of humanitarian assistance
consignments to the extent compatible with reasonable health and
safety standards;
3.3.6.9 exempting humanitarian assistance consignments
from customs duties and all other fees, taxes or charges of any
kind;
3.3.6.10 waiving or simplifying normal visa requirements
for designated personnel of the Assisting State or organization
so as to permit entry and exit without delay;
3.3.6.11 authorizing the Assisting State or organization
to operate its own means of communication unless serious national
security interests would be prejudiced thereby;
3.3.6.12 authorizing the Assisting State or organization
to operate its own means of transportation;
3.3.6.13 rendering logistic support to the Assisting State
or organization within the limits of the resources available and
without charge;
3.3.6.14 ensuring and facilitating freedom of access to
and freedom of movement within the area of humanitarian assistance
operations for the designated personnel of the Assisting State
or organization for the purposes of their mission;
3.3.6.15 granting to the Assisting State or organization
and to designated personnel the necessary privileges, protection
and facilities required to enable humanitarian assistance operations
to be carried out effectively.
3.3.7 Obligations of assisting personnel. At all times
during humanitarian assistance operations the assisting personnel
shall:
3.3.7.1 confine their activities to purely humanitarian tasks required by the nature of their mission;
3.3.7.2 cooperate with the designated competent authority
of the receiving State;
3.3.7.3 prevent the occurrence of any abuse of privileges,
protection or facilities granted;
3.3.7.4 respect and observe the laws and customs of the
Receiving State;
3.3.7.5 refrain from misuse of information obtained in
confidence.
This section describes the main elements of an emergency and post-disaster
response. It highlights aspects to which the responsible authorities
and assisting agencies need to give particular attention.
3.4.2.1 Disaster alert (warning/pre-impact period):
the period beginning when a public warning of an imminent disaster
threat is issued until its actual impact (or the threat passes
and the warning is lifted). During this period, precautionary
or containment measures are taken to minimize the potential adverse
effects of the expected disaster. This can include: evacuation
of people and animals; tying down roofs before a storm; building
emergency earthworks to contain or divert rising flood waters;
and mobilizing fire-fighting resources to prevent a major conflagration.
3.4.2.2 Relief phase: the period immediately following
the occurrence of a sudden disaster, or the late discovery of
a neglected (and thus deteriorated) slow-onset situation. In
this phase, exceptional measures are needed to save and sustain
the lives of survivors and to help them meet basic needs for shelter,
water, food, and medical care. Relief activities are continued
for as long as there are serious and immediate threats to human
life and well-being, and people are unable to meet their basic
survival needs. Activities include:
3.4.2.3 Post-disaster recovery phase: the period
during which actions are taken to enable survivors to resume normal
lives and means of livelihood, and restore infrastructure, services,
and the economy in a manner appropriate to long-term needs and
defined development objectives. Certain relief or welfare measures
which favor specific disadvantaged, and more vulnerable groups
may continue for some time during this phase. Recovery encompasses
both:
3.4.3 Response phasing. The phasing of the various
activities is shown in Figure 3-1. Precautionary measures are
taken based on plans prepared during the deliberate planning process.
Post-disaster emergency responses are planned and implemented
on the basis of post-impact assessments. The disaster alert and
relief phases together, constitute the "emergency phase".

Figure 3-1 Emergency and post-disaster interventions
The following paragraphs list some of the more common myths and
the conclusions of experienced professional observers. The prevalence
of these myths and the actual realities must be kept in mind by
those in government and assistance agencies who plan and undertake
emergency assistance operations.
3.5.1.1 Panic and disorderly flight in the face of danger.
In fact, few people are observed to panic in the face of a natural
disaster. Even when an evacuation is ordered, the majority of
local inhabitants are reluctant to act and do not want to leave.
When forced to evacuate, most move in a responsible manner.
3.5.1.2 Disaster survivors are shocked and helpless.
On the contrary, the motivation of the uninjured survivors is
often the greatest resource in saving others, providing casualty
care, restoring essential services, and beginning the process
of recovery. Their reactions are sometimes more rational than
those of outside relief workers. However, interveners who act
as if survivors were helpless can create a sense of helplessness
and dependence. Those who take a paternebatic approach to dispensing
assistance can create unrealistic expectations and demands from
the survivors.
3.5.1.3 Anti-social behavior and looting are common.
Studies do not support this common belief. There are few verified
cases of large-scale looting or other forms of crime in the immediate
aftermath of a disaster. However, most disaster survivors do
prefer to remain as close as possible to their homes to protect
their property and their right of occupation.
3.5.2 Other myths. Other myths which are contradicted
by experience and research include:
3.5.2.1 Disasters are random killers. In reality,
the poor are hardest hit, especially women, children and the elderly.
3.5.2.2 Search and rescue depends on formal rescue organizations.
In reality, the majority is done by fellow survivors.
3.5.2.3 Survivors rely on relief organizations for their
immediate needs. In reality, they help each other to seek
help from friends, family, and local institutions such as their
religious community.
3.5.2.4 Public shelters and temporary relief camps are
needed after a disaster. In reality, people go to shelters
only as a last resort. Resources invested in establishing temporary
shelter after a disaster may be better used to support immediate
repair and reconstruction efforts, or at least to provide materials
which can be reused in such efforts.
3.5.2.5 Epidemics are an immediate threat after every
disaster. In reality, epidemics do not spontaneously occur
after a disaster, and the presence of corpses does not lead to
catastrophic outbreaks of disease. The key to preventing disease
is to improve sanitary conditions and educate the public.
3.5.2.6 News media accounts are generally reliable.
In reality, they are often inaccurate, or at least misleading
by focusing on the most extreme cases of damage, which are not
typical.
3.5.2.7 Things are back to normal within a few weeks.
In reality, the effects of a disaster last a long time-much longer
than the international interest and sympathy evoked initially
by the disaster.
3.5.2.8 Any kind of assistance is useful, and is needed immediately. In reality, hasty responses based on impartial assessments contribute to chaos and consume valuable resources which could be better used for other priority needs. The local population and services often cover immediate life-saving needs.
3.6.2 Community self-reliance. Initial action to
provide medical care and to try to restore essential services
(notably telecommunications, water and power supplies) is similarly
taken by the technicians living and working in the area. They
are more effective if preparedness plans have been established
and tested in advance.
3.6.3 Outside assistance from within. The first
wave of "outside" assistance comes with the arrival
of personnel, supplies, and equipment from provincial national
Government, and NGOs which are well-established in the country.
While helping to provide immediate assistance, these "interveners"
have as a priority to assess the situation and determine the needs
for both relief and recovery assistance.
3.6.4 International assessment. Representatives
of the international community resident in the country may accompany
the first national government and/or NGO personnel into the area
(or follow close behind) to participate in or make their own assessments.
To the extent that they can commit resources, they may immediately
arrange some initial assistance. The bulk of international assistance,
where such is required, will be mobilized only after the findings
and recommendations of the initial assessments become known.
Some may have been assembled and dispatched from donor countries
and organizations earlier, on the basis of initial news reports
and other preliminary information, but such shipments might not
be entirely appropriate.
3.6.5 Tailoring international assistance. In all
cases, assistance, particularly international assistance, should
be specifically designed to support and complement local efforts
and resources. It should focus on, and normally be restricted
to, providing personnel and material assistance which fill a priority
need and cannot otherwise be mobilized locally. Keeping the objective
clearly in mind, the aim of promoting rapid and sustainable recovery
as well as meeting humanitarian needs must be planned to take
into account long-term implications as well as short-term considerations.
3.6.6 Underestimating national recovery capability.
In practice, outside assistance agencies frequently underestimate
the resources and capacity of the affected populations to take
responsibility for their own survival and recovery. An experienced
researcher has noted that material assistance following sudden
disasters generally:
3.6.7 Inhibiting local initiative. Providing unnecessarily
large quantities of relief can have negative effects and can create
dependency, undermining the markets for local producers. Even
the expectation or anticipation of large-scale assistance can
inhibit local initiative in relation to basic humanitarian needs,
as well as social and economic recovery. In some cases, supplies
distributed to disaster survivors are never used, and many of
the initial, "temporary" measures (repairs of temporary
shelters) are never replaced. They become permanent.
3.6.8 Local economy is priority. The re-establishment
of the local economy and job security is likely to be more important
to many of the survivors than ad hoc material assistance. Specifically
with regard to reconstruction, one authority suggests that: "...the
majority of people affected are the poor. For the poor, disasters
represent lost property, jobs and economic opportunity. In real
terms they can represent an enormous economic setback. This approach
may also assist in solving the difficult problem of how to assist
survivors of disasters among the populations of unauthorized squatter
settlements. Therefore, reconstruction assistance should be designed
to:
3.6.9 Long-term considerations. In situations where
large numbers of people are displaced for extended periods, the
survival of many may depend on large-scale humanitarian assistance
for extended periods. In cases of natural sudden onset disasters,
international assistance rarely plays a major role during the
actual emergency phase. It can, on the other hand, make a vital
contribution to rehabilitation and the gradual process of recovery,
including incorporating relevant mitigation measures. These,
rather than relief, should normally be the main focus of international
aid organizations (vice military or civil defense assets) and
external donors in the wake of most sudden disasters. However,
donors should be ready to respond rapidly if specific unmet relief
needs are clearly identified and specified.
3.6.10 Short-term disaster relief. If international
search and rescue teams are required, they must be on-site and
operational within 24-48 hours to be useful. Similar considerations
also apply in many cases to medical specialist or surgical teams
as well as international MCDA.
3.7.1.1 The rapid establishment of telecommunication links
with all affected areas is essential for both reporting assessment
data and operational management. The latter also demands the
capability to link with all locations where supplies could be
obtained and stored.
3.7.1.2 Information about diverse needs, resources on-hand
and/or in the pipeline, and logistic capacities and constraints,
is the basis for decisions regarding resource allocations and
operations management at all levels. Information must be reliable,
up-to-date, and intelligently analyzed. It must also be shared,
regularly, with all concerned. Systems must ensure the reporting
of relevant information and its systematic storage, analysis,
and use by policy makers and operational managers. Personal computers
with database and spreadsheet software are valuable tools, provided
personnel are experienced in their use. Graphics and mapping
programs are additional valuable aids if user expertise is available.
Use of E-Mail, and teleconferencing can link national and international
sources to practitioners at the disaster site.
3.7.1.3 Many different groups have roles which may be interrelated,
or even overlapping. The coordination of all activities and efforts
is essential for achieving objectives and making the most effective
use of available resources. Coordination must be at both formal
and informal. Regular meetings between the responsible government
authorities, operational agencies (particularly the Red Cross/Red
Crescent and NGOs), donors, and the UN organizations are an absolute
necessity. During any major emergency, there should also be broad-based
meetings at national and district levels. Experience shows the
value of sub-groups being formed on specific topics (such as health
and nutrition, shipping, and logistics). Informal meetings of
each distinct group of "interveners" (government agencies,
NGOs, external donors) can also be useful.
3.7.1.4 Ideally, a UN focal point for coordinating HADRO
at the international, national and local levels would establish
command and control of vital life saving resources, by avoiding
duplication and tailoring of IDRA to the emergency at hand.
3.7.2 Assessment quality. The quality of the assessment
determines, in large part, the quality of the response and the
extent to which objectives are achieved. The availability of
resources is also clearly a key factor to the possibilities of
mobilizing resources, both nationally and internationally, is
significantly influenced by the perceived quality of the assessment.
The needs and proposed assistance strategies must be presented
convincingly.
3.7.3 Timing. The initial assessment - must be
completed rapidly in all areas in order to provide a basis for
a fair allocation of resources, not disfavoring the less accessible
areas. Nevertheless ongoing - more detailed assessments should
occur throughout the duration of the crisis and recovery periods.
3.7.4 Decisive action. Once these prerequisites
are assured, effective response depends on decisive action to
implement the selected strategies. Leadership and a practical,
problem-solving approach is required at all levels. While clear
overall direction is needed from the responsible national authority
(setting policies and standards, and defining basic criteria and
procedures), management responsibility should normally be decentralized
as much as possible.
3.7.5 Other considerations. Other practical considerations
include:
3.7.5.1 Establishing overall priorities. The focus initially
should be on areas where damage and losses are expected to be
greatest, and on saving lives and enabling critical facilities
and lifeline services to function.
3.7.5.2 Enabling local communities to participate fully
in defining local priorities for rehabilitation, and social and
economic recovery.
3.7.5.3 Phasing rehabilitation and reconstruction measures
over a realistic time period, and similarly planning the delivery
of all large-scale programs, and corresponding assistance inputs,
in phases. This allows the possibility of mid-term corrections,
if needed.
3.7.5.4 Making constructive use of all available mechanisms
to achieve the desired objectives, including using the private
sector, where appropriate, to arrange the delivery of supplies.
(The government or assistance agencies might provide stamps or
coupons which entitle the bearer to obtain specified goods at
controlled, subsidized prices from commercial suppliers.)
3.7.6 Post-disaster assessment. Post-disaster "assessment"
is a complex, inter-disciplinary process which involves:
3.7.6.1 Determining the impact of events on individuals
and the society as a whole, the direct and indirect effects and
losses incurred, and the resources remaining to the survivors
and communities concerned.
3.7.6.2 Making judgments and recommendations concerning
objectives and, in particular:
Effective disaster response requires:
3.9.2 CON's. Assistance should not:
In the context of refugees and displaced persons, durable solutions should be supported as early as possible.
Although absolute standardization may not always be appropriate,
equitability must be assured:
3.20.1 Disaster profile of a country.
3.20.2 National policies, objectives and standards.
3.20.3 Government structures for warning and emergency response.
3.20.6 Resources: material and human.
3.20.7 Medical/health care.
3.20.8 Food supplies.
3.20.9 Nutrition and epidemology.
3.20.10 Water supplies, hygiene and environmental sanitation.
3.20.11 Emergency shelter and relief materials.
3.20.12 Construction equipment.
3.20.13 Communications.
3.20.14 Logistics systems and facilities.
Logistics considerations include details of normal transport routes
and capacities to and within the disaster-prone areas, and knowledge
of the specific logistical problems likely to be faced moving
supplies following a disaster.
This chapter describes a basic framework for developing a national
disaster relief strategy. The principles in Section I highlight
the need for Member States to enhance their ability to cope with
sudden onset disasters. The strength of a national government
to react to its own internal catastrophic disasters, impacts its
ability to reach out to the international community.
Sections II and III build upon Section I by describing emergency
response principles that should be considered when writing contingency
plans; and providing checklists focusing on disaster reduction
and mitigation.